I think that the Bucks getting Gasol is just a dream.
Bucks Trades
Started by
Guest_Eric Buenning_*
, Dec 26 2012 11:36 AM
62 replies to this topic
#23
JeremySchmidt
-
- Administrators
-
- 83 posts
Administrator
Posted 27 December 2012 - 06:26 AM
I'd Love to see this trade.
Bucks get: A. Affalo (From Magic)
Moe Harkless (From Magic)
Patrick Patterson (From Houston)
Houston get: M. Ellis (From Bucks)
J. Henson (From Bucks)
Magic get: C. Delfino (From Houston)
Terrance Jones (From Houston)
D. Lamb (From Bucks)
It worked on the Trade Machine but I couldn't get the link to work.
I'm pretty sure I read that Harkless is damn near untouchable. Not sure why, but, yeah.
#24
Young_Bucks_Fan
-
- Members
-
- 3 posts
Joe Alexander
Posted 27 December 2012 - 10:15 AM
Yeah it's tough to say where that trade would need to be modified, but I have a feeling Cleveland would hold out for more for Varejao. I guess it's just kind of a too good to be true type thing for me, you know? Milwaukee gets pretty much the three best players in the deal.
@Jeremy Schmidt
I see where you are coming from...
We can only hope.
#28
Guest_jake_*
Guest_jake_*
-
- Guests
Posted 28 December 2012 - 10:44 AM
If the bucks were able to trade Ellis and Gooden (and another PF if the lakers were still into depth) and the bucks could acquire Jodie Meeks and Pau Gasol that would benefit both teams. Ellis would be a great 6th man and could be backup PG (another nash injury at his age is possible). The lakers could also use Gooden, a quality teammate and player. The bucks acquiring gasol and getting rid of Ellis could create a great PnR game for jennings, and meeks is a quality SG who could co-exist with jennings. I plugged it into trade machine and it worked. Thoughts?
#29
JeremySchmidt
-
- Administrators
-
- 83 posts
Administrator
Posted 28 December 2012 - 11:22 AM
If the bucks were able to trade Ellis and Gooden (and another PF if the lakers were still into depth) and the bucks could acquire Jodie Meeks and Pau Gasol that would benefit both teams. Ellis would be a great 6th man and could be backup PG (another nash injury at his age is possible). The lakers could also use Gooden, a quality teammate and player. The bucks acquiring gasol and getting rid of Ellis could create a great PnR game for jennings, and meeks is a quality SG who could co-exist with jennings. I plugged it into trade machine and it worked. Thoughts?
I think the Bucks would need to give up more than just Ellis and Gooden. Perhaps Harris or Henson or someone along those lines too, at the very least. Gasol is a top 25 player when healthy - those guys don't come cheap.
#30
JeremySchmidt
-
- Administrators
-
- 83 posts
Administrator
Posted 28 December 2012 - 11:22 AM
every trade posted is absolutely ridiculous with the exception of MAYBE 1 or 2if your going to post a trade at least think about it from both point of views
Haha, there are certainly some questionable ones floating around. I think the key is definitely to have justifiable reasons on both sides, not just the Bucks side.
#31
justryod3
-
- Members
-
- 89 posts
Toni Kukoc
Posted 28 December 2012 - 03:38 PM
i dont think gasol would benefit us with his struggles, age, and injury we have plenty of young big men who are still devolping and getting better day by day so there is no reason to go after a guy like gasol and give up half of our offense (ellis) and the bucks front office would never do that so all the talk about we want gasol should die down a little, not only on our side but the lakers have been looking to trade him for years now yet never have they want more than hes worth.
but i will say that i would be happy getting gasol if we were trading away ersan paired with 1 or 2 guys we dont use
#32
Guest_Ben W_*
Guest_Ben W_*
-
- Guests
Posted 29 December 2012 - 07:50 AM
http://espn.go.com/n...tradeId=brhwvdw
Probably wouldn't happen but I think it would be good for both sides.
Milwaukee gets a true PG and a young SG.
Toronto gets Jennings who could give them a more long term solution at PG and they get an expiring contract.
#33
Guest_Ben W_*
Guest_Ben W_*
-
- Guests
Posted 29 December 2012 - 07:58 AM
http://espn.go.com/n...tradeId=cjsuzae
Bucks get a superstar. Probably would need some tweeking but I think the foundation of the trade is good.
Bucks get Aldridge.
Jazz get Jennings
Blazers get Millsap
Might need to give the Blazers a bit more for them to consider it and also seeing as Millsap could leave in free agency.
#34
Patti
-
- Members
-
- 92 posts
Toni Kukoc
Posted 29 December 2012 - 11:56 AM
I would really like this trade. In those 2 years that Gasol will be productive, he will for sure be better than Ersan. The team would need to quickly find a backup PG (Ridnour?), but I like it.
Gasol would draw a lot of fan interest and he would make the Bucks a top 4 team in the East this season. If the team isn't going to tank, then they might as well go after Gasol,
I would really like this trade. In those 2 years that Gasol will be productive, he will for sure be better than Ersan. The team would need to quickly find a backup PG (Ridnour?), but I like it.
Gasol would draw a lot of fan interest and he would make the Bucks a top 4 team in the East this season. If the team isn't going to tank, then they might as well go after Gasol,
I would really like this trade. In those 2 years that Gasol will be productive, he will for sure be better than Ersan. The team would need to quickly find a backup PG (Ridnour?), but I like it.
Gasol would draw a lot of fan interest and he would make the Bucks a top 4 team in the East this season. If the team isn't going to tank, then they might as well go after Gasol,
Bucks paying the final two years of Gasol contract just doesn't seem like a financially prudent decision to me. He is not going to be able to single handed get the Bucks a Championship. He's not that "Star" that we could build our franchise around. It would be a costly, quick fix. Not sure the reward would justify the risk.
#36
Guest_Ricardo Dubreus_*
Guest_Ricardo Dubreus_*
-
- Guests
Posted 30 December 2012 - 02:51 AM
I just thought of something if you look at the roster of the Bucks and the Thunder there team are almost identical except for the Thunder three stars scores more ppg. We have a Serge Ibaka and most of the Buck's shots come from our big 3 in Ellis, Jennings, and Dunleavy and both Defenses are pretty good its just that the Thunder 3 main scorers are more athletic. I just thought interesting this was interesting
#37
Guest_Jimmy_*
Guest_Jimmy_*
-
- Guests
Posted 30 December 2012 - 11:41 AM
@Jeremy Schmidt
What is your thoughts on this trade?
Bucks: Greg Monroe, Corey Maggette
Pistons: Monta Ellis, Doran Lamb.
Reasoning:
The Pistons have two great young Centers in Andre Drummond and Greg Monroe. The Pistons can use more scoring help and Ellis can provide that for them. Drummond has shown the he can play and may need more game time to fully develop. The Bucks need a Center, and greg monroe would be a great fit which allows Sanders to slide to PF. The bucks would play a big lineup that can create many miss matches and would work in Scott's defensive schemes. Why I added Maggette is the fact the he is one a 1 year deal. He was needed to make the financials balance, and he will be treated like a Gooden. He probably won't be used, but luckily he is only one 1 year deal. Doran Lamb is loved by many fans of Milwaukee, but he hasn't impressed me. I love Henson, Sanders, Moute, and Jennings. But Lamb feels lost to me when he is on the court. And he needs to work on his defense. Lamb does have upside though which the Pistons could be interested in. We all know that Ellis is leaving after the year, so trading him is key. I also personally don't like Ellis on the bucks. I like Ellis as a player though. I feel that Brandon and Ellis offensive styles are to similar. They take turns shooting and neither are hot on a consistent basis. Plus they have defensive liabilities when they are on the court together. And Greg Monroe is currently still cheap, great player, and under a two year deal. He is going to get a huge deal once he is finish with his current contract, so maybe the pistons see that as a benefit of trading him? Why resign a player for a lot more money, when they can stick with Drummond who is on a cheap 4 year deal.
Thoughts? Am I totally crazy with this trade?
And yes, it worked in the ESPN trade machine.
#38
JeremySchmidt
-
- Administrators
-
- 83 posts
Administrator
Posted 30 December 2012 - 11:45 AM
@Jeremy Schmidt
What is your thoughts on this trade?
Bucks: Greg Monroe, Corey Maggette
Pistons: Monta Ellis, Doran Lamb.
Thoughts? Am I totally crazy with this trade?
And yes, it worked in the ESPN trade machine.
Yes. You're totally crazy with this trade.
You don't trade one of the best young big men in the league for one season of Monta Ellis in the middle of a rebuild. Yes, the Pistons have Drummond, another talented young big man, but why wouldn't they want two super talented young big men? If you're reasoning that the Bucks would be happy with Sanders and Monroe up front, why would the Pistons not be super excited to have Monroe and Drummond up front?
#39
justryod3
-
- Members
-
- 89 posts
Toni Kukoc
Posted 30 December 2012 - 01:56 PM
http://espn.go.com/n...tradeId=brhwvdwProbably wouldn't happen but I think it would be good for both sides.
Milwaukee gets a true PG and a young SG.
Toronto gets Jennings who could give them a more long term solution at PG and they get an expiring contract.
im just trying to figure out if your a bucks fan or raptors fan, i dont see how basically trading kyle lowry for jennings is a good trade
http://espn.go.com/n...tradeId=cjsuzaeBucks get a superstar. Probably would need some tweeking but I think the foundation of the trade is good.
Bucks get Aldridge.
Jazz get Jennings
Blazers get Millsap
Might need to give the Blazers a bit more for them to consider it and also seeing as Millsap could leave in free agency.
This is an example of a well thought out trade EXCEPT it is absolutely ridiculous for us to trade our whole team just to say "er wez hav da superstarz"
plus im against guys like aldrgide because when he gets the ball everyone stands and watches and messes with flow of offense just like bogut did to us
#40
Guest_Ben W_*
Guest_Ben W_*
-
- Guests
Posted 30 December 2012 - 04:06 PM
im just trying to figure out if your a bucks fan or raptors fan, i dont see how basically trading kyle lowry for jennings is a good trade
This is an example of a well thought out trade EXCEPT it is absolutely ridiculous for us to trade our whole team just to say "er wez hav da superstarz"
plus im against guys like aldrgide because when he gets the ball everyone stands and watches and messes with flow of offense just like bogut did to us
I think the first one would be good because the Bucks get a good PG in Lowry and a young SG in Ross. I've actually talked to some Raptors fans and they said there's no way the Raptors would do that deal.
In the second one the Bucks would still have a really good team. Might switch Sanders for Henson or Udoh but not sure then if Portland would do that. With the deal as is the Bucks starting lineup would look something like Ellis or Udrih at PG, Matthews or Ellis at SG, Moute or Daniels or Matthews at SF, Aldridge at PF, and Udoh at C. I think having Aldridge would be great the Bucks need a talented player like him if they want to ever compete for a title.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
